Documents / Reading Paths

Reading Paths

Choose the path closest to your question or discipline. Each path begins with an internal explanation, preserves the strongest inference it does not authorize, and leads to source inspection only when needed.

Diagram showing one reading-path hub routing physicists, mathematicians, AI and agent researchers, software and system engineers, and external reviewers to internal prerequisite pages while preserving the no-new-claims boundary.
The diagram illustrates audience reading paths connecting each discipline to internal routes and source-authority context.

How to use this index

Read by question, then inspect source authority.

These paths are navigation layers. They lower the cost of finding the relevant pages without replacing the records that own claim status.

Route type
Canonical reading-path indexOne Documents route organizes the general-public path and anchored specialist paths through existing pages.
Audience
General readers, specialists, and reviewersChoose the path that matches your question, then move from internal explanation to source inspection.
Boundary
No new claimsReading order does not update source state, promote a result, or replace the records that own a claim.
Reader rule
Internal route before provenanceUse the page that explains the question first; inspect source and manifest evidence when an audit is needed.

Audience paths

Pick the route family that matches your review question.

Every path follows one rule: read canonical internal pages first, then use source links and manifests as provenance when auditing a claim or artifact.

Physicists

Start with current status, then inspect the derivation boundary.

This path is for readers asking what the physics program currently claims, where the open GR burden sits, and which stronger claims remain blocked.

Do not infer
Boundary for this pathDo not infer completed first-principles GR derivation, `g_eff`, matter coupling, Einstein equations, benchmark promotion, or downstream GR promotion.

Mathematicians

Follow definitions, construction burdens, and obstruction scope.

This path is for readers checking formal objects, route constraints, finite examples, no-target-import discipline, and local negative results.

Do not infer
Boundary for this pathDo not infer existence, uniqueness, regularity, or global impossibility from a reading path, diagram, local freeze, or finite toy result.

AI and agent researchers

Read workflow authority before evaluating agent behavior.

This path is for readers studying bounded AgentJobs, role records, parent-child synthesis, memory retrieval, validators, and completion evidence.

Do not infer
Boundary for this pathDo not infer that AI workflow owns physics decisions, validator PASS is proof, or role labels grant authority without task-local records.

Software and system engineers

Inspect operation, validation, publication, and tool boundaries.

This path is for readers reviewing system operation, maintainer workflows, validation evidence, project-system repair, and publication provenance.

Do not infer
Boundary for this pathDo not infer that tool availability is authorization, build success is scientific truth, or manifest presence replaces source review.

External reviewers

Establish claim and source boundaries before direct inspection.

This path prepares a reviewer to inspect source status, current burdens, and authority boundaries before opening research artifacts.

Do not infer
Boundary for this pathDo not infer that this path is a review verdict, a review invitation, or evidence that the scientific claims are complete.